Warren Buffett is always quick to warn investors about becoming emotionally attached to a stock they own. To paraphrase the Oracle of Omaha, “That 100 shares of stock doesn’t know that you own it.” I’ve echoed that philosophy on occasion, telling clients that a hundred shares of Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO) won’t tell you it loves you when you come home at night. But as investors, we sometimes find ourselves gravitating toward the same group of… Read More
Warren Buffett is always quick to warn investors about becoming emotionally attached to a stock they own. To paraphrase the Oracle of Omaha, “That 100 shares of stock doesn’t know that you own it.” I’ve echoed that philosophy on occasion, telling clients that a hundred shares of Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO) won’t tell you it loves you when you come home at night. But as investors, we sometimes find ourselves gravitating toward the same group of stocks because of their dependable performance. Buffett himself is guilty of this with holdings such as Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) or The Washington Post Co. (NYSE: WPO), which have served as two of Berkshire Hathaway’s (NYSE: BRK-A, BRK-B) stalwart holdings for decades. At StreetAuthority, we refer to these names as “Forever” stocks. But there’s one stock in particular I find myself coming back to time and time again: Intel (Nasdaq: INTC). Long Live The PC Fifteen years ago, the strongest argument for owning shares of Intel was that the company manufactured the brains for 80% of the world’s computers. As… Read More